Dispatches from real Cleanaholics inspections and remediations across Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, reported the way a newsroom would: what happened, what the instruments found, and what it means for the next home. Neighbourhoods are real. Names are changed. Every number is as recorded.
Newest first. Each headline opens the full report. New dispatches are filed as inspections are completed.

The owner came back to a musty smell and visible mould, and the design studio handling the repaint asked for an assessment before the first coat went on. Twelve air readings sat within limits. Under the lamp, the bed, the bathroom, the air-conditioning and the insides of the cabinets told the story of the months nobody was there.
A fifteen-year-old semi-detached home with mould across the living hall and bedrooms, a daughter working from home in one of them, and a parent's specific health worry. The instruments found the mould in the gypsum and the humidity feeding it. The literature review found no evidence for the symptom she feared, and the inspector wrote that down.
Nine storeys of other people's plumbing above, sixty-two per cent humidity, and three rooms with three different stories. The master bedroom had a formaldehyde source. The small bedroom had five times the volatile compounds of the rest of the flat and no chemical cause. Under the lamp, a halo around the air-conditioner and a pillow soaked through told the inspector why.
A newly renovated subsale bungalow, empty and waiting for the family. One room smelt musty, and an earlier half-day treatment had not fixed it. The inspection found clean air and wet walls, black mould behind the feature wallpaper, and the beginning of the most documented remediation in this library.
The staff had stopped noticing the smell. Under the lamp the gypsum partitions, the carpet and the chairs were all carrying it; one water-damaged wall read 979 against a dry wall at 146. Then the inspector wrote the builders a page about why mould comes back in new buildings, and how to design it out.
Two young children, two feature walls that kept growing mould, and one question: is this my home, my neighbour or the building? The thermal camera found no leak anywhere. The answer was seventy per cent humidity, stale air and an exterior wall that bakes every afternoon, and it was the better answer.
The toilet wall was five per cent of it. The living-room wall she shares with her son's bedroom was fully colonised, the store room was worse, and the moisture meter read Wet inside the plaster. Then the report drew a line between what a renter can do today and what the owner of the walls must.
A musty smell, a ceiling that never looked dry, and a thousand square feet of freshly fitted melamine. The lamp found mould in nearly every room and inside the kitchen cabinets beside the glassware; the thermal camera and the moisture meter found the water arriving from the unit upstairs. Two problems, two owners.
Water came over the balcony threshold during a storm and had twenty-one days alone with the bamboo floors and plaster walls. The inspection that followed was written for a loss adjuster who would never visit: the tide lines, the thermal bands, and a moisture meter pinned at its maximum at every point.
Black mould on the wall of a room about to become a nursery. A structured colony above a light switch in the parents' bedroom that nobody had seen. And twenty-year-old wallpaper across a Bandar Baru Bangi bungalow that had quietly turned from a finish into a moisture trap. The report gave two honest answers and refused to blur them.
The smell met visitors at the door. The feature wall read 999 at four points. The thermal camera found the water arriving from the ceiling, and the neighbour downstairs had already complained. Eight settle plates then showed what the family of four was breathing.
She called about the sewage on the ground floor. The moisture meter still read Wet days after the mopping. Then the ultraviolet lamp found established mould across the ceilings and walls, and the report did something few contractors do: it declined to sell her the answer.
Four adults, a renovation three years old, and fungal growth the family could see. The moisture meter found no dampness in a single wall. The humidity monitor found the answer instead: 67 to 69 per cent, day in and day out, feeding growth on every ceiling the lamp touched.
No leak, no damp, healthy humidity and two air purifiers running. The inspector ruled out every usual suspect, then switched off the lights. Under ultraviolet, the tiled floor fluoresced in circular blooms from the grout lines out.
Under the lamp, the mould was on the walls, the ceilings, the curtains and the floor. Beside the balcony the wall read 999. And the source of the smell that greeted every visitor was a piece of joinery by the front door.
The air was clean. Every airborne reading passed. But the new owner asked for the building to be examined before demolition, and the moisture meter, the thermal camera and the ultraviolet lamp found a very different apartment behind the paint.
Water crossed the living room, the corridor and both balconies. The instruments mapped where it went. Then the inspector opened six culture plates, left them for five days, and gave the occupants, the owner, the building and the insurer a picture of the air itself.
The owner booked an inspection because she had read about formaldehyde in new cabinets. The kitchen cupboards confirmed her fear. Then the ultraviolet lamp went inside the bedroom wardrobes and up through the toilet ceiling, and the inspector told her which problem actually mattered.
The leak from upstairs had been stopped and the mould painted over. The tenants could still smell it. Two hours with a moisture meter, a thermal camera and an ultraviolet lamp showed why a finished-looking repair had not reached the problem.
Behind the reports sit the full technical records: the brief, every reading, the ultraviolet and thermal evidence, the verdict. Filter by problem or property.

Ninety days, eleven hold-point stages, eighteen fungal isolates recovered by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia and two named to the species by DNA. A family home remediated and rebuilt before a single box was moved in.

A thirty-year-old condominium, repainted a month earlier and still musty. The slab read 999 on the moisture meter behind a clean panel, and the ultraviolet lamp explained the rest.
No published record matches that filter yet. New records are added every week.
Every review below is a screenshot of the public review on our Google Business Profile, unedited. Each one links to the original so you can verify it on Google yourself.
Cleanaholics Sdn Bhd on Google, 100+ public reviews. We do not curate away the critical ones; they are all there on the profile.
See all reviews on Google







Screenshots captured on 27 September 2026 from the public Google Maps listing of Cleanaholics Sdn Bhd. Reviewer names and photographs are as published by the reviewers themselves on Google. Google and Google Maps are trademarks of Google LLC; Cleanaholics is not affiliated with Google.
The same 13-point Hygiene & Mould Inspection, the same instruments, the same written report, for homes and offices across Kuala Lumpur and Selangor.
On privacy. In every record the client’s name has been changed and the building, unit and street withheld. Readings, photographs, findings and recommendations are from the actual inspection or project, unaltered. All observations are indicative, taken at a single point in time, and are not medical advice or a legal determination.
Thanks for subscribing!
This email has been registered!